> > In my opinion, we should look for the possibility of reworking the
> > CC_mapping function (which maps PGresult class to QResultClass) to
> > increase the performance. As Ludek pointed out, we must identify the
> > code to be cleaned up in different parts of the driver.
> Yes, I'd was thinking about this whilst driving home last night. It
> seems to me that we should be able to make the PGresult a member of the
> QResultClass, and then just modify the accessors appropriately. Of
> course, it's not quite that simple, but I think it's doable.
Yes, I was thinking about this. And it need some brainstorm ...
When you use declare/fetch there can be more PGresults or
what about type conversion (you can take data number of time) and so on.
But I'm unable to orient in code becouse a lot of them is unusable
(I think PQprepare, PQexec with binding params can reduce the code a lot).
I call for cleaning the code (even at the expense of some feture lost)
In response to
pgsql-odbc by date
|Next:||From: Dave Page||Date: 2005-12-16 12:53:59|
|Subject: Re: Next development steps?|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2005-12-16 02:47:33|
|Subject: Re: Does postgresql-odbc work on 64-bit platforms? |