Re: 10g v. PostgreSQL 8.0 v. MySQL 5

From: Robert Bernier <robert(dot)bernier5(at)sympatico(dot)ca>
To: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 10g v. PostgreSQL 8.0 v. MySQL 5
Date: 2005-12-13 20:58:33
Message-ID: 200512131558.33611.robert.bernier5@sympatico.ca
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

Folks,

It was pointed out that I struck a nerve in my last posting. There's always a polite way of voicing criticism. It would have made for a less confrontational argument if I had taken my happy pill this morning and stuck to the facts that I was arguing rather than ranting with strange sounds coming from my mouth about somebody I've never met.

For the record, I am quite prepared to defend my analysis of the methodology used in the the article itself.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mike Ellsworth 2005-12-14 17:57:12 EU data retention
Previous Message Robert Bernier 2005-12-13 12:37:39 Re: 10g v. PostgreSQL 8.0 v. MySQL 5