Re: 10g v. PostgreSQL 8.0 v. MySQL 5

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 10g v. PostgreSQL 8.0 v. MySQL 5
Date: 2005-12-13 02:23:03
Message-ID: 20051213022303.GH24605@surnet.cl
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> >>>Interesting article; author's bias for Oracle got overturned by us:
> >>>http://www.suite101.com/article.cfm/oracle/115560
> >>
> >>Not hardly. Lewis is a hard-core Oracle geek. But open-minded. He and
> >>I have been debating OSS vs. Proprietary databases on ITToolbox.com for
> >>some time.
> >
> >
> >Well, ok, maybe his bias wasn't overturned, but we still came out ahead
> >despite it.
>
> How come he tested 8.0 and not 8.1? Is it an old article?

Judging by the date on the comments, it's from May at the latest.

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Bernier 2005-12-13 12:37:39 Re: 10g v. PostgreSQL 8.0 v. MySQL 5
Previous Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2005-12-13 02:13:28 Re: 10g v. PostgreSQL 8.0 v. MySQL 5