Slow email caught in the act

I just found an email that took 5 days to be delivered. Looking at the
headers below, the holdup was between m2x.hub.org and postgresql.org.
Can someone take a look at the two boxes and see what's going on?

Also, would -www have been the better place for this? I'm not sure if
they handle email stuff...

----- Forwarded message from Stephen Slezak <sslezak(at)pervasive(dot)com> -----

Return-Path: pgsql-advocacy-owner+M8222(at)postgresql(dot)org
X-Original-To: decibel(at)decibel(dot)org
Delivered-To: decibel(at)decibel(dot)org
Received: from mx2.hub.org (mx2.hub.org [200.46.204.254])
by flake.decibel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5439F1527C
for <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>; Tue, 6 Dec 2005 00:09:27 -0600 (CST)
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [200.46.204.71])
by mx2.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05380514AE8;
Tue, 6 Dec 2005 06:09:12 +0000 (GMT)
X-Original-To: pgsql-advocacy-postgresql(dot)org(at)localhost(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C14C49DCAD1
for <pgsql-advocacy-postgresql(dot)org(at)localhost(dot)postgresql(dot)org>; Thu, 1 Dec 2005 19:15:17 -0400 (AST)
Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 43083-01
for <pgsql-advocacy-postgresql(dot)org(at)localhost(dot)postgresql(dot)org>;
Thu, 1 Dec 2005 19:15:13 -0400 (AST)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-
Received: from ausimss.pervasive.com (ausimss.pervasive.com [66.45.103.246])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A46669DCAB4
for <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>; Thu, 1 Dec 2005 19:15:11 -0400 (AST)
Received: from ausbayes2.aus.pervasive.com ([172.16.8.6]) by ausimss.pervasive.com with InterScan Messaging Security Suite; Thu, 01 Dec 2005 17:15:11 -0600
Received: from FRASPAM.fra.pervasive.com ([10.1.16.7]) by ausbayes2.aus.pervasive.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713);
Thu, 1 Dec 2005 17:15:11 -0600
Received: from brumail2.bru.pervasive.com ([10.5.16.61]) by FRASPAM.fra.pervasive.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713);
Fri, 2 Dec 2005 00:15:06 +0100
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] joint booths at upcoming tradeshows
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2005 00:15:05 +0100
Message-ID: <23AD75501B0F224E85B7F62766178B8701F8735D(at)brumail2(dot)bru(dot)pervasive(dot)com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [pgsql-advocacy] joint booths at upcoming tradeshows
Thread-Index: AcX13EA7k+/T1h3MQS+/wKoOVRCB/QA8IzWg
From: Stephen Slezak <sslezak(at)pervasive(dot)com>
To: "Jim C. Nasby" <jim(at)nasby(dot)net>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: Jim Nasby <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>,
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>,
sichen(at)opensourcestrategies(dot)com, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Dec 2005 23:15:07.0358 (UTC) FILETIME=[11942FE0:01C5F6CD]
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org
X-Mailing-List: pgsql-advocacy
List-Archive: <http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-advocacy>
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org?body=help>
List-ID: <pgsql-advocacy.postgresql.org>
List-Owner: <mailto:pgsql-advocacy-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org>
List-Post: <mailto:pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org?body=sub%20pgsql-advocacy>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org?body=unsub%20pgsql-advocacy>
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-advocacy-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.4 (2005-06-05) on flake.decibel.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
version=3.0.4

We also should have some extra space in out booth (right beside the .org section) where we could highlight other solutions that run on PostreSQL

Steve

-----Original Message-----
From: pgsql-advocacy-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
[mailto:pgsql-advocacy-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org]On Behalf Of Jim C. Nasby
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2005 12:31 PM
To: Josh Berkus; Stephen Slezak
Cc: Jim Nasby; Bruce Momjian; sichen(at)opensourcestrategies(dot)com;
pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] joint booths at upcoming tradeshows

On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 10:11:53AM -0800, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Jim,
>
> >Speaking of which, a coworker (Steve Slezak) has info from IDG; they
> >want to know who to talk to about a PostgreSQL .org booth for Linux
> >World '06. He emailed this list a while ago but never got a reply.
>
> Ooops, sorry, I must have missed that in the non-member posts.
>
> Which LWE? Boston, San Francisco, Sydney, what?

Boston, Apr. 4-6.
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com
Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?

http://archives.postgresql.org

----- End forwarded message -----

--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com
Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461