Re: undefined behaviour for sub-transactions?

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Jaime Casanova <systemguards(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tyler MacDonald <tyler(at)yi(dot)org>, Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca>, Tim Bunce <Tim(dot)Bunce(at)pobox(dot)com>, Jochen Wiedmann <jochen(dot)wiedmann(at)gmail(dot)com>, Paul DuBois <paul(at)snake(dot)net>, dbi-users(at)perl(dot)org, perl(at)lists(dot)mysql(dot)com, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: undefined behaviour for sub-transactions?
Date: 2005-12-01 18:35:08
Message-ID: 200512011835.jB1IZ8T25812@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Tom Lane wrote:
> Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> writes:
> > Where is Postgres at with psql using savepoints implicitly to wrap every
> > client command btw?
>
> I think that 8.1 psql can be told to do that.

Right:

\set ON_ERROR_ROLLBACK interactive

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jason Long 2005-12-01 19:10:18 Re: information_schema._pg_keypositions() in 8.1???
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-12-01 18:31:25 Re: undefined behaviour for sub-transactions?