Re: BUG #2065: Problem with language conversion in pg_dump

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Wim Audenaert <wima85(at)hotmail(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #2065: Problem with language conversion in pg_dump
Date: 2005-11-25 20:33:51
Message-ID: 200511252033.jAPKXpg06090@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Tom Lane wrote:
> "Wim Audenaert" <wima85(at)hotmail(dot)com> writes:
> > When I create a new database, this function (oid 17039 and used for utf8
> > translation) is not defined in the pg_proc table. I tried to create a new
> > database. The pg_proc table contains several functions, but not this one.
>
> Hmm, I see that utf8_to_tcvn() doesn't seem to be there anymore, but
> whether that's a bug in itself is for someone else to answer (Tatsuo?).
> What I'm wondering about is how a reference to a nonexistent function
> OID got into your new database. There is no case in which pg_dump
> should reference a function by OID.

TCVN is was renamed to the official name PG_WIN1258 in 8.1. This was
part of the general encoding renaming in 8.1.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2005-11-25 20:38:57 Re: [BUGS] BUG #2052: Federal Agency Tech Hub Refuses to Accept
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2005-11-25 20:18:01 Re: [HACKERS] BUG #2052: Federal Agency Tech Hub Refuses to Accept