Re: Hardware/OS recommendations for large databases (

From: "Steinar H(dot) Gunderson" <sgunderson(at)bigfoot(dot)com>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Hardware/OS recommendations for large databases (
Date: 2005-11-20 14:29:35
Message-ID: 20051120142935.GA32311@uio.no
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Sun, Nov 20, 2005 at 09:22:41AM -0500, Greg Stark wrote:
> I don't think that's true. If the syscall was preemptable then it wouldn't
> show up under "iowait", but rather "idle". The time spent in iowait is time in
> uninterruptable sleeps where no other process can be scheduled.

You are confusing userspace with kernel space. When a process is stuck in
uninterruptable sleep, it means _that process_ can't be interrupted (say,
by a signal). The kernel can preempt it without problems.

/* Steinar */
--
Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alan Stange 2005-11-20 18:09:06 Re: Hardware/OS recommendations for large databases (
Previous Message Greg Stark 2005-11-20 14:22:41 Re: Hardware/OS recommendations for large databases (