Re: Rebranding PostgreSQL

From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Rebranding PostgreSQL
Date: 2005-11-16 21:53:50
Message-ID: 20051116215350.GF23557@phlogiston.dyndns.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 10:09:51AM -0800, john(dot)bender(at)hushmail(dot)com wrote:
>
> So, is it a little shady to want to slide PostgreSQL in under the
> radar? I'm simply trying to downplay what it is...it's my take that
> what they don't know won't hurt them.

I appreciate what you're trying to do. At the same time, why do you
think your customers will be more willing to go for John's Database
than some community product called PostgreSQL? (And yes, I suspect
there _are_ such people.)

A

--
Andrew Sullivan | ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca
"The year's penultimate month" is not in truth a good way of saying
November.
--H.W. Fowler

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Sabino Mullane 2005-11-16 22:37:52 Re: Rebranding PostgreSQL
Previous Message Mott Leroy 2005-11-16 21:42:03 Incomplete Startup Packet