Re: Fixes for 8.1 run of pgindent

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Fixes for 8.1 run of pgindent
Date: 2005-11-15 15:34:51
Message-ID: 20051115153451.GF5868@surnet.cl
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:

> (Of course this just begs the question of whether we could convert
> over to GNU indent. But I suppose that isn't a realistic option
> for the current go-round.)

Yeah, I was wondering the same thing yesterday. The README in the
pgindent directory mentions a GNU indent version not being useful, but
it's the version that was current in 2000. In a GNU mirror I see that
the tarball increased about 6 times in size in the meantime. Maybe it
has gotten somewhat better.

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.amazon.com/gp/registry/DXLWNGRJD34J
Syntax error: function hell() needs an argument.
Please choose what hell you want to involve.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2005-11-15 15:59:55 Re: Réf. : Re: [HACKERS] Runn
Previous Message Gregory Maxwell 2005-11-15 15:32:38 Re: Réf. : RE: Running PostGre on DVD