Re: Fixes for 8.1 run of pgindent

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Fixes for 8.1 run of pgindent
Date: 2005-11-15 01:26:12
Message-ID: 20051115012612.GA17840@surnet.cl
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > I think we should rerun pgindent on 8.1.X and HEAD to correct the
> > reported problems. I am betting 90% of our patches either come from
> > CVS head or 8.1.X branches greater than 8.1.0.
>
> Can you post a diff showing what would change exactly?
>
> I'd like to hold off for at least a little bit on reindenting HEAD,
> because I've got a fair size set of changes for nulls-in-arrays that
> I'm still a day or two away from committing. Reindenting right now
> is likely to cause a rather painful merge problem because I updated a
> lot of comments. I'm not sure who else has major patches in progress
> (anyone out there?), but I may not be the only one with a problem.

I have two moderate-size patches that I'm planning to submit shortly.

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Treat 2005-11-15 01:31:50 Re: functions marked STABLE not allowed to do INSERT
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-11-15 01:01:03 Re: Fixes for 8.1 run of pgindent