| From: | Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tony Caduto <tony_caduto(at)amsoftwaredesign(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Comments from a Firebird user via Borland Newsgroups. |
| Date: | 2005-11-10 03:46:21 |
| Message-ID: | 20051110034621.GA27411@wolff.to |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 19:35:30 -0600,
Tony Caduto <tony_caduto(at)amsoftwaredesign(dot)com> wrote:
> <We found PostgreSQL a mature product, but in two things Firebird was
> simply better than PostgreSQL: Two-Phase commit (ok, that is gone with
> PG 8.1), but the second is a SNAPSHOT / REPEATABLE READ transaction
> isolation. I can't live without that when it comes having a stable view
> of data during one transaction, or did that change with 8.1? Is there
> now a SNAPHOST / REPEATBLE READ transaction isolation level available as
> well?>
>
> Just wondering what the PG take on this snapshot repeatable read stuff is.
http://candle.pha.pa.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/sql-set-transaction.html
http://candle.pha.pa.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/transaction-iso.html
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-11-10 05:07:14 | Re: Comments from a Firebird user via Borland Newsgroups. |
| Previous Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2005-11-10 03:30:10 | Unclear documentation |