Re: CA spins Ingres off to independent company

From: elein <elein(at)varlena(dot)com>
To: "Richard P(dot) Welty" <rwelty(at)averillpark(dot)net>
Cc: Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: CA spins Ingres off to independent company
Date: 2005-11-08 17:16:02
Message-ID: 20051108171602.GT26501@varlena.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy


FWIW:

The alive and well exingres community which lives with the tag:
"Exingres -- Ingres corporate culture without the corporation"
also weighs in on this issue.

Some people suggest if only Ingres moved back to Alameda and
the culture were resurrected, then they might even join the enterprise.
Those are unlikely events, however.

One person said, "This particular dog likely won't be returning
to his own vomit."

elein: exingres, exillustra, exinformix
elein(at)varlena(dot)com

On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 12:13:15AM -0500, Richard P. Welty wrote:
>
> On Nov 8, 2005, at 7:52 AM, Christopher Browne wrote:
> >It doesn't strike me as being anywhere near as interesting as the
> >InnoDB Oy buyout, so I'll be happy to let others "take point" in the
> >defocus :-).
>
> really.
>
> Ingres is of tremendous historical importance, but how long has
> it been since anyone really "cared" in a practical sense?
>
> reviving interest in Ingres strikes me as being a rather challenging
> job, and a lot of folks who might be interested would seem to be
> otherwise occupied.
>
> richard
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
> choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
> match
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Cornelia Boenigk 2005-11-08 17:19:22 Re: Links to press coverage
Previous Message Andreas Pflug 2005-11-08 17:15:59 Re: Links to press coverage