From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> |
Cc: | Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)myrealbox(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, PostgreSQL WWW Mailing List <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: On-line docs for PG 8.1 need updating |
Date: | 2005-11-07 20:50:42 |
Message-ID: | 20051107165007.C993@ganymede.hub.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-www |
On Mon, 7 Nov 2005, Neil Conway wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-07-11 at 11:03 +0900, Michael Glaesemann wrote:
>> I agree with your points. One reservation I have is that people might
>> be more likely to run a beta in a production environment. Nowadays it
>> seems increasingly common for projects to release betas for
>> widespread circulation. I don't know if this is something that should
>> be encouraged for PostgreSQL. I'd hate to see people get a bad
>> impression of PostgreSQL because a beta screws up their data.
>
> IMHO it is fairly clearly a good thing to get more publicity for
> Postgres betas. That is the whole point of the beta program in the first
> place: I don't see that putting more beta information on the main
> website is fundamentally different from sending email announcing betas
> to -announce, for example. Provided that the caveats are clear, I think
> there's a lot to be gained by publicizing betas more effectively.
As long as it is appropriate tagged as being beta (and clearly), I tend to
agree ... the more ppl we can encourage to test/pound a beta, the better
the end release is ...
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kris Jurka | 2005-11-07 21:35:26 | 8.1 PDF Documentation. |
Previous Message | Neil Conway | 2005-11-07 20:43:13 | Re: On-line docs for PG 8.1 need updating |