| From: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: slru.c race condition (was Re: TRAP: FailedAssertion("!((itemid)->lp_flags & 0x01)", ) |
| Date: | 2005-11-01 18:49:44 |
| Message-ID: | 20051101184944.GD20349@pervasive.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 11:23:55AM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > "Jim C. Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com> writes:
> > > AFAIK they're not using subtransactions at all, but I'll check.
> >
> > Well, yeah, they are ... else you'd never have seen this failure.
>
> Maybe it's in plpgsql EXCEPTION clauses.
Err, I forgot they're using Slony, which is probably using savepoints
and/or exceptions.
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com
Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-11-01 19:21:29 | Re: slru.c race condition (was Re: TRAP: FailedAssertion("!((itemid)->lp_flags & 0x01)", ) |
| Previous Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2005-11-01 18:49:08 | Re: slru.c race condition (was Re: TRAP: FailedAssertion("!((itemid)->lp_flags & 0x01)", ) |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-11-01 19:21:29 | Re: slru.c race condition (was Re: TRAP: FailedAssertion("!((itemid)->lp_flags & 0x01)", ) |
| Previous Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2005-11-01 18:49:08 | Re: slru.c race condition (was Re: TRAP: FailedAssertion("!((itemid)->lp_flags & 0x01)", ) |