| From: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alex Turner <armtuk(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Yonatan Ben-Nes <da(at)canaan(dot)co(dot)il>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: SQL injection |
| Date: | 2005-11-01 15:09:18 |
| Message-ID: | 20051101150918.GK20349@pervasive.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 10:13:20PM -0500, Alex Turner wrote:
> I didn't think query plans were cached between sessions, in which case
> prepeared statements aren't worth much for most HTTP based systems
> (not counting luckily re-using the same connection using pgpool)...
>
> Please correct me if I'm mistaken - I like being wrong ;)
No, you're right, but if you're not using connection pooling you clearly
don't care about performance anyway...
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com
Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2005-11-01 15:15:04 | Re: A Not Join |
| Previous Message | Jan Wieck | 2005-11-01 15:02:38 | Re: Oracle 10g Express - any danger for Postgres? |