Re: [HACKERS] FKs on temp tables: hard, or just omitted?

I have applied a more limited patch that mentions this. I do not want
to mention _why_ we do not implement it because it is partly performance
and partly complexity, I think, and some combinations make no sense,
like temporary primary and non-temp foreign.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 30, 2005 at 05:31:07PM -0800, Josh Berkus wrote:
> > Folks,
> >
> > Thanks, all! Now, if only I could remember who asked me the question ...
>
> ISTM we should add a note about this to the docs...
>
> Here's a patch for create_table.sgml, though there's probably some other
> places this could go...
> --
> Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com
> Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
> vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461

[ Attachment, skipping... ]

>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073