Re: FKs on temp tables: hard, or just omitted?

From: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: Sander Steffann <steffann(at)nederland(dot)net>, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: FKs on temp tables: hard, or just omitted?
Date: 2005-10-31 17:56:19
Message-ID: 20051031175619.GH20349@pervasive.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

On Sun, Oct 30, 2005 at 05:31:07PM -0800, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Folks,
>
> Thanks, all! Now, if only I could remember who asked me the question ...

ISTM we should add a note about this to the docs...

Here's a patch for create_table.sgml, though there's probably some other
places this could go...
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com
Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461

Attachment Content-Type Size
temp_ri.patch text/plain 911 bytes

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2005-10-31 17:56:45 Re: slru.c race condition (was Re: [HACKERS] TRAP: FailedAssertion("!((itemid)->lp_flags
Previous Message Jim C. Nasby 2005-10-31 17:46:19 Re: slru.c race condition (was Re: TRAP: FailedAssertion("!((itemid)->lp_flags & 0x01)", )

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2005-10-31 17:56:45 Re: slru.c race condition (was Re: [HACKERS] TRAP: FailedAssertion("!((itemid)->lp_flags
Previous Message Jim C. Nasby 2005-10-31 17:46:19 Re: slru.c race condition (was Re: TRAP: FailedAssertion("!((itemid)->lp_flags & 0x01)", )