Re: The argument for reinstating --as-needed

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: The argument for reinstating --as-needed
Date: 2005-10-29 18:47:17
Message-ID: 200510291847.j9TIlHK00555@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


At this stage, I am thinking this is best left for 8.2. It is
impossible for us to test it enough.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
-- Start of PGP signed section.
> As some of you may remember, a patch for adding --as-needed to the GNU
> linker command line was added [1] and subsequently removed [2] under
> the mistaken assumption that it was a linker bug [3]. It isn't.
>
> The bug is actually in readline, in that it doesn't declare its
> dependancy on termcap/ncurses. Note: this bug was fixed back in 2002 in
> Debian (so no Debian systems are affected by this problem) but is still
> present in the latest Redhat release and probably many other places.
>
> I propose we add a workaround for readline and add the flag back again.
> The benefits are obvious, from 228 to 87 DT_NEEDED records across a
> normal PostgreSQL installation, and the server will no longer depend on
> readline (always an odd point). The patch is attached: it basically
> adds a reference to termcap/ncurses directly so the psql binary links
> to it. psql is the only binary that uses readline so this solves the
> problem.
>
> Just a quick note as to why it's not a bug in the linker. The
> --as-needed flag includes DT_NEEDED records only for libraries
> referenced by the objects. The issue is that ld removed termcap, needed
> by readline but not by psql directly.
>
> To see why this is not a bug, think about what the -l options are for.
> They are for resolving symbols not found in the objects you are
> linking. The linker *does not* look for the symbols needed by the
> shared libraries given. Static libraries (being sets of objects) yes,
> shared libraries no. Shared libraries have their own DT_NEEDED records
> to say what they depend on, they don't need to be checked again.
>
> On my Debian system where readline is configured correctly, ncurses is
> not mentioned on the link line and the linker doesn't look for it
> either. It is used at runtime though.
>
> Other issues:
>
> (a) won't this happen again with some other library? Well, unlikely.
> Obviously this can only affect libraries we list on our link line.
> Note, a library having this problem would fail autoconf tests also, so
> we'd know about it. We already have a hack in the autoconf stuff for
> readline already, I just don't think people expected it to apply to
> Redhat.
>
> (b) it wastes 4 bytes. Well yes, but I think the benefits outweigh the
> costs. I added it to input.c but it could be a seperate file.
>
> (c) an autoconf test to test for this condition. Well, I thought about
> it but the cost and effort of maintaining such a test is far higher
> than just forcing the reference.
>
> Have a nice day,
>
> [1] http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2005-05/msg00042.php
> [2] http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2005-05/msg00488.php
> [3] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=157126
> --
> Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> > Patent. n. Genius is 5% inspiration and 95% perspiration. A patent is a
> > tool for doing 5% of the work and then sitting around waiting for someone
> > else to do the other 95% so you can sue them.

[ Attachment, skipping... ]
-- End of PGP section, PGP failed!

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2005-10-29 19:04:33 Re: The argument for reinstating --as-needed
Previous Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2005-10-29 18:28:43 The argument for reinstating --as-needed