Re: [GENERAL] 'a' == 'a '

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Dann Corbit <DCorbit(at)connx(dot)com>, Richard_D_Levine(at)raytheon(dot)com, general(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] 'a' == 'a '
Date: 2005-10-25 03:41:11
Message-ID: 200510250341.j9P3fBW14657@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > OK, I understand now. It is tempting to think that the difference
> > between char() and varchar() is that internally they use a different
> > collating sequences, but that isn't the case. If it were, space would
> > be ignored during comparisons any place in the string, when in fact, is
> > it is only trailing space that char() ignores, e.g.:
>
> No, you don't understand. The standard defines PAD SPACE as making
> *trailing* spaces irrelevant to comparisons, not embedded or leading
> spaces. And they regard PAD SPACE as an attribute of a collation rather
> than of the string datatype. This seems pretty wacko to me (in
> particular it's hard to see how NO PAD is useful with char(N) storage)
> but that's what they did.

So you can have two collating sequences where in one trailing space is
significant, and another that isn't? Strange.

> > What additional documentation is needed?
>
> Some specific discussion of the relationship to the standard would be
> helpful, perhaps.

I guess, but explaining it seems pretty complex in itself, and I am
unsure what value it adds.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Fuhr 2005-10-25 03:45:17 Re: BUG #1993: Adding/subtracting negative time intervals
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-10-25 03:39:14 Re: [PATCHES] Win32 CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() performance