Re: searching array

From: Matthew Peter <survivedsushi(at)yahoo(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: searching array
Date: 2005-10-17 19:06:31
Message-ID: 20051017190631.57611.qmail@web35212.mail.mud.yahoo.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Thanks. That syntax didn't look right to find values
gte 10000. But thanks everyone!

--- Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> Matthew Peter <survivedsushi(at)yahoo(dot)com> writes:
> > Yes. I did read it wrong. I wanted to find all
> records
> > that contained x where x >= 10000
>
> Then flip it around:
>
> contain x where 10000 <= x
>
> 10000 <= ANY (array)
>
> For syntactic reasons, there's no "ANY(array) >= x"
> construct,
> so you have to write it this way.
>
> regards, tom lane
>



__________________________________
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
http://mail.yahoo.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dean Gibson (DB Administrator) 2005-10-17 19:17:03 Re: Planner regression in 8.0.x ?
Previous Message Chris Travers 2005-10-17 19:05:59 Re: [GENERAL] Oracle buys Innobase