Re: Minor point about contrib/xml2 functions "IMMUTABLE" marking

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, John Gray <jgray(at)azuli(dot)co(dot)uk>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Minor point about contrib/xml2 functions "IMMUTABLE" marking
Date: 2005-10-13 16:10:14
Message-ID: 200510131610.j9DGAE605449@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Well, should be marked as VOLATILE? A web lookup?
>
> Yes. Its value is determined by factors outside the database, so
> it has to be categorized as volatile.

OK, done.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message C Wegrzyn 2005-10-13 16:18:13 Re: BUG #1962: ECPG and VARCHAR
Previous Message Thomas Hallgren 2005-10-13 16:05:43 pg_config --pgxs on Win32