| From: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Bernier <robert(dot)bernier5(at)sympatico(dot)ca>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: mysql woes |
| Date: | 2005-10-12 19:45:00 |
| Message-ID: | 20051012194500.GB24235@fetter.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 02:30:37PM -0500, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> Interesting that he didn't test RI, which AFAIK doesn't work with
> MyISAM. But of course he didn't mention the real issue
> (transaction/ACID), so what do you expect...
As far as I can tell, the whole transaction/ACID business was never
important to anybody but MySQL's marketing department, so why should
they be concerned now?
Cheers,
D
--
David Fetter david(at)fetter(dot)org http://fetter.org/
phone: +1 510 893 6100 mobile: +1 415 235 3778
Remember to vote!
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2005-10-12 20:18:40 | Re: mysql woes |
| Previous Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2005-10-12 19:30:37 | Re: mysql woes |