Re: Feedback from LinuxWorld, London

From: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Subject: Re: Feedback from LinuxWorld, London
Date: 2005-10-10 23:27:15
Message-ID: 20051010232715.GD39569@pervasive.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 03:07:26PM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Folks,
>
> > > And of course they are right. ??Porting from MySQL to PostgreSQL is a
> > > problem, one which could only be solved by dumbing down PostgreSQL to
> > > accept many of MySQL's idiosyncracies, which isn't going to happen.
> >
> > It does make me think that we should try to adopt some more of MySQL's
> > idiosyntactics even if we don't fully adopt their idiosyncracies.
>
> I really don't agree that the chief problem with porting from MySQL is our
> failure to implement ISNULL() or ENUM. I don't even think that's in the
> top 10.
>
> The biggest issues are:
> 1, 2, 3, and 4) Lack of information, e.g. no "PostgreSQL for MySQL users"
> handbook.
> 5) Flakyness of data migration tools, which are largely unmaintained these
> days;
> 6) Lack of data abstraction in many OSS apps (this we can't fix).

Well, 1-4 and 6 are all tied together: lack of information (and in some
cases exposure to that info).
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com
Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message elein 2005-10-11 00:05:46 Re: Feedback from LinuxWorld, London
Previous Message Jim C. Nasby 2005-10-10 23:25:38 Re: Feedback from LinuxWorld, London