Re: [HACKERS] Patching dblink.c to avoid warning about open

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Jonathan Beit-Aharon <jbeitaharon(at)intrusic(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Patching dblink.c to avoid warning about open
Date: 2005-10-07 16:05:16
Message-ID: 200510071605.j97G5Gj06255@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > The problem with not using rconn is that we are not saving the
> > transaction status at the _start_ of the cursor open. If we don't do
> > that, we have no way of knowing on close if _we_ opened the transaction
> > or whether it was opened by the user.
>
> Oh, I see. In that case the flag is horribly misnamed and miscommented.
> Something like "newXactForCursor" would be clearer.

OK, renamed to isClientXact.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2005-10-07 16:06:41 Re: Vote needed: revert beta2 changes or not?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-10-07 15:59:53 Re: [HACKERS] Patching dblink.c to avoid warning about open transaction

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2005-10-07 21:18:46 Re: [BUGS] BUG #1927: incorrect timestamp returned
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-10-07 15:59:53 Re: [HACKERS] Patching dblink.c to avoid warning about open transaction