Re: Open items list for 8.1

From: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Open items list for 8.1
Date: 2005-10-01 00:04:44
Message-ID: 20051001000444.GV40138@pervasive.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 06:58:05PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> We don't have the ability to have to functions that take the same
> parameters and return different results because there is no facility to
> decide which function to call based on what return value is expected,
> because a simple query doesn't have a return value restriction:
>
> SELECT pg_cancel_backend();

Duh, I keep forgetting that.
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com
Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jon Jensen 2005-10-01 00:04:54 Re: \d on database with a lot of tables is slow
Previous Message Jim C. Nasby 2005-10-01 00:00:46 Re: PCTFree Results