Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: XA

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Chris Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>
Subject: Re: XA
Date: 2005-09-30 03:09:31
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

> There was an JDBC-based *attempt* at an XA handler; it wasn't fully
> functional, which essentially means it wasn't really XA.
> When the 2PC discussion was going on, it definitely came up in the
> discussion that this was a prerequisite to doing XA properly.  It
> might not be forcibly necessary in the strictest sense, but 2PC is
> certainly one of the normal means for synchronizing distributed
> transactions...

But ... now that we have 2PC, XA could be implemented through pg-jdbc if 
someone wanted to, yes?

Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco

In response to

  • XA at 2005-09-28 03:10:53 from Chris Browne


  • Re: XA at 2005-09-30 05:31:22 from Kris Jurka

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Kris JurkaDate: 2005-09-30 05:31:22
Subject: Re: XA
Previous:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2005-09-30 03:07:17
Subject: Re: Time to start the PR machine

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group