| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Tony Caduto <tony_caduto(at)amsoftwaredesign(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] 8.1 observation |
| Date: | 2005-09-23 17:53:14 |
| Message-ID: | 200509231753.j8NHrEO13075@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Tony Caduto <tony_caduto(at)amsoftwaredesign(dot)com> writes:
> > I just noticed that pronargs in pg_proc does not show the full arg
> > count, seems only to show count of IN args.
> > shouldn't this show the full arg count including in/out/inout?
>
> There was some discussion of that just a day or so ago; so far no one's
> come up with a reasonable suggestion for what the output should look like.
Is this a TODO? You don't really pass the OUT parameters as parameters
to the function, so the current behavior seems fine to me.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-09-23 17:53:38 | Re: PQtrace doesn't work |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-09-23 17:31:47 | Re: PQtrace doesn't work |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-09-23 17:58:21 | Re: [GENERAL] 8.1 observation |
| Previous Message | Mark Lewis | 2005-09-23 17:43:02 | Re: [PERFORM] Releasing memory during External sorting? |