| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-documentation <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] statement_timeout logging |
| Date: | 2005-09-16 20:54:55 |
| Message-ID: | 20050916205455.GA9069@surnet.cl |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 03:41:11PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> pgman wrote:
> > I have updated the message to:
> >
> > errmsg("canceling query due to user request or statement timeout")));
>
> Oops. Did we freeze the message strings already for this release?
Not yet.
I'm not sure I agree with the wording though -- is there no way to tell
the difference?
--
Alvaro Herrera -- Valdivia, Chile Architect, www.EnterpriseDB.com
"No single strategy is always right (Unless the boss says so)"
(Larry Wall)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-09-17 04:31:16 | Re: [HACKERS] statement_timeout logging |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-09-16 19:52:37 | Re: [PATCHES] Caveat for Domains |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2005-09-16 21:07:34 | Re: Why does VACUUM FULL bother locking pages? |
| Previous Message | Jonah H. Harris | 2005-09-16 20:41:39 | Re: Why does VACUUM FULL bother locking pages? |