| From: | Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Subject: | Re: FAQ/HTML standard? |
| Date: | 2005-09-11 03:32:06 |
| Message-ID: | 20050911033206.GA29136@wolff.to |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 00:56:11 +0200,
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> > > XHTML is simply a minimal reformulation of HTML in XML, and even
> > > uses the HTML 4.01 definitions for its semantics. Given that, it's
> > > hard to see why it should be considered a bad thing.
> >
> > Here is the article:
> > http://www.hixie.ch/advocacy/xhtml
>
> While I believe that the reasoning in the article is totally bogus, the
> article only talks about which MIME type should be used for XHTML, not
> about whether the format should be used. Note that if you support the
> conclusion of the article, you may find the entire PostgreSQL web site
> objectionable.
Then you have made an informed decision.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Sandy McArthur | 2005-09-11 06:51:28 | Re: Rendezvous/Bonjour broken in 8.1 beta |
| Previous Message | Petr Jelinek | 2005-09-11 03:17:59 | Re: FAQ/HTML standard? |