On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 03:02:55PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Patrick Welche <prlw1(at)newn(dot)cam(dot)ac(dot)uk> writes:
> > * Allow INET + INT4 to increment the host part of the address, or
> > throw an error on overflow
>
> > I think that the naively coded function attached does what is needed, e.g.,
>
> What happened to the IPv6 case?
My take on the thread is that the IPv6 case doesn't make sense, and the
int8 part was dropped from the TODO.
> Also, I think you need to reject CIDR inputs.
OK
Patrick