| From: | Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | sandhya <sandhyar(at)amiindia(dot)co(dot)in> |
| Cc: | Askar Zaidi <askar(at)mail(dot)nplindia(dot)ernet(dot)in>, postgre <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Reg:Connection Object |
| Date: | 2005-09-02 05:58:55 |
| Message-ID: | 20050902055855.GA60139@winnie.fuhr.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin |
On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 11:19:53AM +0530, sandhya wrote:
> In case of multiple users what will happen?
> Each must have different connection objects right!
That's why global variables are bad. But what's wrong with passing
a PGconn * to various functions? If that's a problem in your
application then please explain why; it's still not clear what
difficulties you're having. Perhaps it would help if you posted a
simple but complete example program that shows what you're trying
to do.
As I mentioned before, this thread is off-topic for pgsql-admin;
it would be more appropriate in pgsql-interfaces or pgsql-general.
--
Michael Fuhr
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Manikandan C | 2005-09-02 07:57:06 | Re: Reg:Connection Object |
| Previous Message | sandhya | 2005-09-02 05:49:53 | Re: Reg:Connection Object |