Re: [BUGS] PSQL commands not backwards-compatible

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [BUGS] PSQL commands not backwards-compatible
Date: 2005-09-02 01:06:18
Message-ID: 200509020106.j8216IM15507@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
[ There is text before PGP section. ]
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> Four years later, people were saying:
>
> >> OK, this new patch prints a warning on any major version
> >> mismatch, newer or older.
> >
> > I would suggest showing both the client and server versions that
> > mismatched. If you're in a scenario with several versions on the same
> > machine of both client and server (hosting scenario, I'd imagine), that
> > would certainly help.
>
> This all seems so familiar somehow... :)
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2001-11/msg00184.php

Yep. I think the reason it is acceptable now is that the server version
is supplied automatically via the protocol, so we don't need to issue a
query on every psql startup to check it.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2005-09-02 01:16:59 Re: PL/pgSQL: EXCEPTION NOSAVEPOINT
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-09-01 23:18:25 Re: PL/pgSQL: EXCEPTION NOSAVEPOINT