From: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: 8.1 release notes |
Date: | 2005-08-24 06:01:13 |
Message-ID: | 20050824060113.GM96732@pervasive.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 12:26:21AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Jim C. Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com> writes:
> > Is the intention that standard_conforming_strings will always be
> > read-only?
>
> For the moment it's read-only false; the long-term goal is that it will
> be read-only true. In between we will have a release or three where it
> is modifiable to some extent. I personally think it would be a *bad*
> idea if it were a mere USERSET variable --- we learned from the
> autocommit fiasco that changing fundamental semantics on a whim does
> not work. But there will need to be some way to alter it for testing
> purposes during the interregnum.
The 'autocommit fiasco' isn't ringing a bell right now, so I'll take
your word for it. :)
Bruce, can you add some info about this to
http://candle.pha.pa.us/cgi-bin/pgescape ? I intend to link to that when
I submit a patch to the release notes that links to more info on the
individual items.
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com
Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com 512-569-9461
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | William ZHANG | 2005-08-24 07:49:14 | Re: CREATE USER and pg_user |
Previous Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2005-08-24 05:54:08 | Re: beginning hackers |