On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 08:34:29AM -0500, Don Drake wrote:
> I agree that a basic function (non-CPU intensive sleep) like this should be
> built in.
It's being discussed in pgsql-hackers:
Do you have any use cases in addition to what's already been
mentioned? Sleeping isn't really a database operation, so there
needs to be some justification for making it a standard function.
In response to
- Re: sleep? at 2005-08-22 14:24:37 from Bruce Momjian
- Re: sleep? at 2005-08-23 14:42:27 from Don Drake
pgsql-admin by date
|Next:||From: Maxi Combina||Date: 2005-08-22 14:10:54|
|Subject: regenereate data/ locales|
|Previous:||From: Don Drake||Date: 2005-08-22 13:34:29|
|Subject: Re: sleep?|