Re: PATCH to allow concurrent VACUUMs to not lock each

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PATCH to allow concurrent VACUUMs to not lock each
Date: 2005-08-14 03:06:38
Message-ID: 200508140306.j7E36cd29559@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Hannu Krosing wrote:
> On R, 2005-08-12 at 15:47 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > This has been saved for the 8.2 release:
> >
> > http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches_hold
>
> Is there any particular reason for not putting it in 8.1 ?

I thought there was still uncertainty about the patch. Is there?

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2005-08-14 04:47:24 pg_stat_file() and length/size
Previous Message Greg Stark 2005-08-14 01:42:45 Re: psql SET/RESET/SHOW tab completion

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2005-08-14 04:47:24 pg_stat_file() and length/size
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2005-08-14 02:34:45 Re: [HACKERS] For review: Server instrumentation patch