From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>, Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] For review: Server instrumentation patch |
Date: | 2005-08-11 18:54:18 |
Message-ID: | 20050811185418.GB24670@alvh.no-ip.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-patches |
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 02:26:16PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > Interesting. I wonder why the function is not defined instead with OUT
> > parameters. That way you don't have to declare the record at execution
> > time. See my patch to pgstattuple for an example.
>
> Uh, where is that patch? I can't find it.
Hmm, seems it never made it to the list, I can't find it in the
archives either. Here it is.
--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]alvh.no-ip.org>)
"¿Qué importan los años? Lo que realmente importa es comprobar que
a fin de cuentas la mejor edad de la vida es estar vivo" (Mafalda)
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
pgstattuple.patch | text/plain | 6.2 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-08-11 20:01:18 | Re: [HACKERS] For review: Server instrumentation patch |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-08-11 18:26:16 | Re: [HACKERS] For review: Server instrumentation patch |