Re: timestamp default values

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Brendan Jurd <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: timestamp default values
Date: 2005-08-07 16:30:59
Message-ID: 20050807163059.GB22043@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Sun, Aug 07, 2005 at 12:47:19AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:

> BTW: at least with our current interpretation of these datatypes, the
> only type that is sensible for a now()-like function to return is
> timestamptz. Not plain timestamp; that cannot be considered to
> represent a well-defined instant at all.

BTW, do we have a type which stores the TZ it originally had?

--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]alvh.no-ip.org>)
"No hay hombre que no aspire a la plenitud, es decir,
la suma de experiencias de que un hombre es capaz"

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Poul Møller Hansen 2005-08-07 19:44:53 Re: Remopte connection to POstgreSQL via ODBC
Previous Message Zlatko Matić 2005-08-07 15:42:41 Remopte connection to POstgreSQL via ODBC