Re: P.tch to mention cost-based delay in vacuum reference

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: P.tch to mention cost-based delay in vacuum reference
Date: 2005-07-30 17:13:21
Message-ID: 20050730171321.GB25396@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

On Sat, Jul 30, 2005 at 01:04:28PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 30, 2005 at 11:46:37AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > >
> > > Updated patch applied. Thanks.
> >
> > Huh, something is very wrong with the markup:
> >
> > http://candle.pha.pa.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/sql-vacuum.html
>
> OK, fixed. link and linkend should not both be used.

Hmm. I like my solution best because the section title will appear in
the link.

--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]alvh.no-ip.org>)
"Porque Kim no hacia nada, pero, eso sí,
con extraordinario éxito" ("Kim", Kipling)

In response to

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2005-07-30 17:15:45 Re: P.tch to mention cost-based delay in vacuum reference
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2005-07-30 17:06:08 Re: P.tch to mention cost-based delay in vacuum reference