Re: Performance problems testing with Spamassassin 3.1.0 Bayes module.

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Matthew Schumacher <matt(dot)s(at)aptalaska(dot)net>
Subject: Re: Performance problems testing with Spamassassin 3.1.0 Bayes module.
Date: 2005-07-28 00:12:15
Message-ID: 200507271712.15299.josh@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Matt,

> After playing with various indexes and what not I simply am unable to
> make this procedure perform any better.  Perhaps someone on the list can
> spot the bottleneck and reveal why this procedure isn't performing that
> well or ways to make it better.

Well, my first thought is that this is a pretty complicated procedure for
something you want to peform well. Is all this logic really necessary?
How does it get done for MySQL?

--
--Josh

Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-07-28 00:41:05 Re: [Bizgres-general] Re: faster INSERT with possible
Previous Message Matthew Schumacher 2005-07-27 22:35:20 Performance problems testing with Spamassassin 3.1.0 Bayes module.