| From: | Roman Neuhauser <neuhauser(at)sigpipe(dot)cz> |
|---|---|
| To: | denis(at)edistar(dot)com |
| Cc: | Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Postgresql with max_connections=4096 |
| Date: | 2005-07-27 09:31:09 |
| Message-ID: | 20050727093109.GA28576@isis.sigpipe.cz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
# denis(at)edistar(dot)com / 2005-07-27 10:22:48 +0200:
> Richard Huxton wrote:
> >Sounds like a BEGIN being re-issued alright. Solution - fix your
> >application(s) and don't use persistent connections (or if you do,
> >make sure you rollback any pre-existing transactions and issue any
> >relevant SET commands).
>
> If that was the problem, I should obtain always that error but I obtain
> that error only after two/three hours of testing.
Not necessarily.
--
How many Vietnam vets does it take to screw in a light bulb?
You don't know, man. You don't KNOW.
Cause you weren't THERE. http://bash.org/?255991
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Karsten Hilbert | 2005-07-27 10:07:05 | Re: back-end triggers front-end to update |
| Previous Message | Kilian Hagemann | 2005-07-27 09:25:07 | Re: Query planner refuses to use index |