| From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Roles - SET ROLE Updated |
| Date: | 2005-07-21 19:54:59 |
| Message-ID: | 20050721195459.GE24207@ns.snowman.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
* Tom Lane (tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us) wrote:
> However, on second thought I'm not sure that this is sensible anyway.
>
> Consider that every role is implicitly a member of PUBLIC --- so isn't
> the above a creation of a circular membership loop, which is (for good
> reason) forbidden by the spec?
Ah, yes, you're right. I won't claim to have considered that in the
original working of the patch though. :)
Stephen
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2005-07-21 19:57:50 | Re: Roles - SET ROLE Updated |
| Previous Message | Greg Stark | 2005-07-21 19:54:28 | Re: Imprecision of DAYS_PER_MONTH |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2005-07-21 19:57:50 | Re: Roles - SET ROLE Updated |
| Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2005-07-21 19:53:52 | Re: [PATCHES] Roles - SET ROLE Updated |