| From: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, darcy(at)dbitech(dot)ca, remi_zara(at)mac(dot)com, books(at)ejurka(dot)com, markw(at)osdl(dot)org, pete(at)economics(dot)utoronto(dot)ca, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Buildfarm issues on specific machines |
| Date: | 2005-07-19 19:25:38 |
| Message-ID: | 20050719192538.GG38511@decibel.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 03:17:49PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
> Jim C. Nasby wrote:
>
> >Then I guess the question is... is it more valuable to have a working
> >buildfarm environment for 7.2 and 7.3, or is the obnoxious failure
> >better to spur someone into looking at it? :) Should this maybe be made
> >a TODO and I'll adjust my config until someone tackles the TODO?
> >
> >
>
> I don't think 7.2 and 7.3 deserve heroic efforts to get every possible
> build in a green state. The main reason to run buildfarm at all on these
> branches is to make sure that any maintenance changes don't break things.
OK, I'll tweak cuckoo's config accordingly then.
--
Jim C. Nasby, Database Consultant decibel(at)decibel(dot)org
Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828
Windows: "Where do you want to go today?"
Linux: "Where do you want to go tomorrow?"
FreeBSD: "Are you guys coming, or what?"
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2005-07-19 19:42:26 | Re: Buildfarm issues on specific machines |
| Previous Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2005-07-19 19:25:12 | Re: More buildfarm stuff |