Re: Autotools update

From: "Matthew D(dot) Fuller" <fullermd(at)over-yonder(dot)net>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Autotools update
Date: 2005-07-03 12:49:33
Message-ID: 20050703124933.GA6730@over-yonder.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Jul 02, 2005 at 09:46:19PM +0200 I heard the voice of
Peter Eisentraut, and lo! it spake thus:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Does the FreeBSD one actually produce different output?
>
> If it did not, why would they bother making a separate package
> called "gnu-autoconf" with the note "This port is specifically
> designed for developers that want to create cross-platform software
> distributions on FreeBSD."?

Because the non-"gnu-" variants patch to stuff version numbers in all
the filenames and invocations down the chain, so you can have
different versions installed at once. Different packages might be
written to different versions, and they tend to be
non-cross-compatible.

--
Matthew Fuller (MF4839) | fullermd(at)over-yonder(dot)net
Systems/Network Administrator | http://www.over-yonder.net/~fullermd/
On the Internet, nobody can hear you scream.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marko Kreen 2005-07-03 12:59:51 Re: contrib/pgcrypto functions not IMMUTABLE?
Previous Message Russell Smith 2005-07-03 11:21:56 Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC