Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Occupied port warning

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Occupied port warning
Date: 2005-06-28 13:14:29
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> IIRC, in previous versions any bind failure was fatal, but in 8.0 we
> decided to be slightly more forgiving and only bail out if we failed
> to bind at all.

I realize that, but I would like to know where that bright idea came 
from in violation of all other principles of this and any other 
software.  I recall that it had something to do with IPv6, but I'm not 

Peter Eisentraut

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Pavel StehuleDate: 2005-06-28 13:19:12
Subject: Re: Implementing SQL/PSM for PG 8.2 - debugger
Previous:From: Dave CramerDate: 2005-06-28 13:00:12
Subject: Re: Implementing SQL/PSM for PG 8.2 - debugger

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group