Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Removing Kerberos 4

From: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>
To: Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Removing Kerberos 4
Date: 2005-06-24 15:21:22
Message-ID: 20050624152122.GO89438@decibel.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 07:34:30PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > Has Kerb4 been marked as depricated in the docs at all? If
> > not it might be best to just do that and then yank it later.
>
> Yes, since 7.4.
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.0/static/auth-methods.html#KERBEROS-AUT
> H
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/7.4/static/auth-methods.html#KERBEROS-AUT
> H
>
> "Kerberos 4 is considered insecure and no longer recommended for general
> use."

Just as a nitpick, in the future it would probably be better to
explicitely say if something is considered depricated and will be
removed in the future. Having said that, that statement means it's
removal shouldn't come as a shock to anyone.
--
Jim C. Nasby, Database Consultant decibel(at)decibel(dot)org
Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828

Windows: "Where do you want to go today?"
Linux: "Where do you want to go tomorrow?"
FreeBSD: "Are you guys coming, or what?"

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Scott Marlowe 2005-06-24 15:23:54 Re: create rule ... as on insert
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2005-06-24 15:19:21 Re: PostgreSQL Certification

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim C. Nasby 2005-06-24 15:33:08 Re: HaveNFreeProcs ?
Previous Message Jim C. Nasby 2005-06-24 15:19:14 Re: [PATCHES] O_DIRECT for WAL writes