Re: PGDN and Bricolage.

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Gevik babakhani <gevik(at)xs4all(dot)nl>
Cc: 'Dave Page' <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, 'Rod Taylor' <pg(at)rbt(dot)ca>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PGDN and Bricolage.
Date: 2005-06-22 00:29:27
Message-ID: 20050621212814.O993@ganymede.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

On Tue, 21 Jun 2005, Gevik babakhani wrote:

>
> Hi All,
>
> Having spent a couple of hours playing with Bricolage and read the docs, I
> find it to be a very powerful backed system for a CMS. However I was
> wondering if we need all this or is there any yet simpler CMS system that
> meets our needs?

IMHO ... just because we may not believe we "need" or "will use" all of
the features today, long term we may find that we use more and more of the
features as we have a better understanding of the overall system ...

----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2005-06-22 07:04:03 Re: PGDN and Bricolage.
Previous Message Rod Taylor 2005-06-21 22:25:14 Re: PGDN and Bricolage.