Re: Volunteer wanted for PostgreSQL Techdocs

You are right,
I am totally new to this Bricolage thing. I have to do some reading anyways.
But will get there eventually :)

Gevik.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rod Taylor [mailto:pg(at)rbt(dot)ca]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2005 2:43 PM
> To: Gevik babakhani
> Cc: 'Magnus Hagander'; 'Dave Page'; pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: RE: [pgsql-www] Volunteer wanted for PostgreSQL Techdocs
>
> On Tue, 2005-06-21 at 10:10 +0200, Gevik babakhani wrote:
> > Hi,
> > Regarding static content:
> > Assuming the content is being exported from bircolage to disk (static!)
> > I do not see any other way than to scan the directory in order to build
> the
> > xml tree.
> >
> > It is properly me, but I am not to found if exporting the files to disk.
> > Don't you guys this it would be better to read the content directly from
> > bircolage database?
>
> You've obviously never seen the Bricolage database. Keep in mind it's
> basically a metamodel which the user uses to define their own, sometimes
> recursive or even fully circular, structures. You cannot "query" the
> entire structure, nor does Bricolage try to do so.
>
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Magnus Hagander [mailto:mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2005 10:01 AM
> > > To: Gevik babakhani; Dave Page; Rod Taylor; pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
> > > Subject: RE: [pgsql-www] Volunteer wanted for PostgreSQL Techdocs
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > The MSDN style navigation that I was experimenting with uses
> > > > a xml tree structure.
> > > >
> > > > Assuming Bricolage creates files on disk:
> > > >
> > > > 1. It is possible to load the entire tree at ones. (this
> > > > would make a slow tree when the content grows)
> > > >
> > > > 2. It is possible to only load a small part of the tree when
> > > > the user expands a given node. Some thing like
> > > > http://zzzzzz/expand_node.php?node=what_ever_node_that_is_clicked
> > >
> > > Will this mirror to a server that only serves static content without
> > > problems, as the current site requires?
> > >
> > > //Magnus
> >
> >
> --