| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)surnet(dot)cl> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Qingqing Zhou <zhouqq(at)cs(dot)toronto(dot)edu>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Autovacuum in the backend |
| Date: | 2005-06-16 01:50:05 |
| Message-ID: | 20050616015005.GA14001@surnet.cl |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
A question for interested parties. I'm thinking in handling the
user/password issue by reading the flat files (the copies of pg_shadow,
pg_database, etc).
The only thing that I'd need to modify is add the datdba field to
pg_database, so we can figure out an appropiate user for vacuuming each
database.
What do people think?
--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]surnet.cl>)
"Acepta los honores y aplausos y perderás tu libertad"
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2005-06-16 02:54:58 | Re: Autovacuum in the backend |
| Previous Message | Jamie Deppeler | 2005-06-16 01:47:13 | Executing SQL Script |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-06-16 02:29:31 | Escape handling in strings |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-06-16 01:45:08 | Re: Autovacuum in the backend |