Re: Add PG version number to NLS files

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Martin Pitt <mpitt(at)debian(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: Add PG version number to NLS files
Date: 2005-06-15 19:22:06
Message-ID: 200506152122.07444.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Bruce Momjian wrote:
> The 'bind' calles in the binaries are going to look for the proper
> version. Does that help, or is libpq the only thing we need to
> handle?

Shared libraries have their version number embedded in the file name for
the explicit purpose of installing more than one version side by side.
Therefore, the PO files also need to make arrangements for side by side
installation. No such promises are made for non-library files.

--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2005-06-15 19:26:52 Re: Add PG version number to NLS files
Previous Message Oleg Bartunov 2005-06-15 19:16:34 Re: Gist Recovery testing

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2005-06-15 19:26:52 Re: Add PG version number to NLS files
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2005-06-15 18:45:18 Re: Add PG version number to NLS files