From: | elein(at)varlena(dot)com (elein) |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Cc: | elein <elein(at)varlena(dot)com> |
Subject: | Conventions for release numbering |
Date: | 2005-06-13 01:38:08 |
Message-ID: | 20050613013808.GU17206@varlena.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
(No, wait, I'm not starting a release numbering discussion.)
If we have release 8.0.3 where 8 is the Major releae,
0 is the minor release and 3 is the version (revision?),
how would we refer to a generic release number:
postgresql-M.m.v ? postgresql-M.m.r ?
Is this our convention? Do either of these work?
I just want to know what our convention might be.
--elein
============================================================
elein(at)varlena(dot)com Varlena, LLC www.varlena.com
PostgreSQL Consulting, Support & Training
PostgreSQL General Bits http://www.varlena.com/GeneralBits/
=============================================================
I have always depended on the [QA] of strangers.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2005-06-13 02:13:15 | Re: Conventions for release numbering |
Previous Message | Tino Wildenhain | 2005-06-11 21:48:29 | Re: Linux Journal 2005 awards |