Conventions for release numbering

From: elein(at)varlena(dot)com (elein)
To: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: elein <elein(at)varlena(dot)com>
Subject: Conventions for release numbering
Date: 2005-06-13 01:38:08
Message-ID: 20050613013808.GU17206@varlena.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

(No, wait, I'm not starting a release numbering discussion.)

If we have release 8.0.3 where 8 is the Major releae,
0 is the minor release and 3 is the version (revision?),
how would we refer to a generic release number:

postgresql-M.m.v ? postgresql-M.m.r ?

Is this our convention? Do either of these work?

I just want to know what our convention might be.

--elein

============================================================
elein(at)varlena(dot)com Varlena, LLC www.varlena.com

PostgreSQL Consulting, Support & Training

PostgreSQL General Bits http://www.varlena.com/GeneralBits/
=============================================================
I have always depended on the [QA] of strangers.

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc G. Fournier 2005-06-13 02:13:15 Re: Conventions for release numbering
Previous Message Tino Wildenhain 2005-06-11 21:48:29 Re: Linux Journal 2005 awards